Time: 2024-09-30
On Sunday, Governor Gavin Newsom veto a California Artificial intelligence safety bill, know as S.B. 1047, which was aim at regulation the growth of new technology in the state. The bill necessitate safety testing of large A.I. system before release, authorize the lawyer general to Sue company over technology-associate injury, and mandate a killing switch for potential emergency. Newsom state that the bill was flaw, focus too much on regulation for frontier model without see potential hazard associate with the technology.
The decision to veto the bill has trip criticism from technical_school expert and academician who recommend for the legislation. Governor Newsom confront intense pressure to veto the bill amidst a national argument on A.I. regulation. lobbyist both for and against the bill prosecute in a heat discussion about the benefit and potential danger of the technology. Newsom's move to veto the bill is expect to rich_person significant deduction on the future of A.I. regulation in California and beyond.
following the veto, Governor Newsom seek advice from generative A.I. expert to develop safety_rail for the technology establish on empirical, science-establish analysis. Some leadership in the A.I. industry raise concern that the bill, if pass, could drive A.I. company away from California and impede invention. State Senator Scott Wiener, the bill's writer, stress the need for legislation to protect the populace from potential hazard associate with advance A.I. models.
Despite the veto, Newsom express his committedness to working with the legislature on A.I. legislation in the future. The governor foreground the importance of inform decision-devising in regulation A.I. system to guarantee populace safety. As the argument on A.I. regulation continue at both the state and Federal degree, the function of technology in society and the economy remains a key focus for policymakers and industry stakeholders.
Governor Newsom's decision to cull the artificial intelligence safety bill reflect the complex challenge of regulation emerge technology in a rapidly evolve digital landscape. The argument on A.I. regulation is likely to escalate in the approach old_age as promotion in technology raise new ethical, legal, and social question. Newsom's emphasis on empirical analysis and collaboration with expert signal a proactive approach to address the hazard and opportunity associate with artificial intelligence in California and beyond.